Research on Research, Policy & Culture
Research on Research, Policy & Culture
Review
metrics
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
Open Science for Missions and Observatories: Practical Choices to Shape Your Observing Adventure
[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
Peer Reviewers
Invited
- Funder
- The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Work done by staff of Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, was performed under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (80NM0018D0004).
Research Article
metrics
Revised
The costs and benefits of research grant funding peer review
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Christopher Cotton;
Balazs Aczel;
Alejandra Recio Saucedo;
Axel Philipps
- Funder
- Medical Research Council
Review
metrics
The Call for Open Science in Modeling
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Mehmet Keçeci
Systematic Review
metrics
Quantity or Quality? A Systematic Review of Research Policies, Funding, and Collaboration in Indonesia
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Adrian Barnett
Research Article
metrics
Revised
Interdisciplinary research will never take off: empirical results based on theoretical insights
[version 2; peer review: 1 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Dillip K Swain
Opinion Article
metrics
Research Technical Professionals as Catalysts in Advancing Open Science
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Andrey Y Fedorov;
Silvio Peroni
- Funder
- The Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC)
Study Protocol
metrics
Evaluation of automated assessments of systematic review adherence to the PRISMA 2020 statement: study protocol
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Ahmed S. BaHammam;
Nguyen Minh Hoang
- Funders
- Monash University Early Career Research Excellence Program (ECREP) grant
- National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator Grant
Research Article
metrics
Contemporary global research cultures: results from a global survey about research conditions
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Mohd Mokhtar Muhamad;
Kimkong Heng
Opinion Article
metrics
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
The need for an evolution of credit attribution in modern scientific publishing
[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
Peer Reviewers
Invited
Research Article
metrics
Revised
Bibliometric Analysis of Publications in Scopus-Indexed Public, Environmental and Occupational Health Journals Across Scimago Quartiles (2016–2024)
[version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Dwi Fitria Al Husaeni;
Steffen Lemke;
Zulfiya Kannazarova
- Funder
- the Student Research Committee, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Study Protocol
metrics
Revised
Tracking the Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Implementation Science: Protocol for a Living Scoping Review of Applications, Evaluation Approaches and Outcomes
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Julia Brasileiro;
James L David;
Omid Panahi
Research Article
metrics
Revised
Can ChatGPT write better scientific titles? A comparative evaluation of human-written and AI-generated titles
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 3 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Aaron A. Funa;
Renz Alvin Gabay;
Helmi Ben Saad;
Yustinus Calvin Gai Mali;
Nurul Aini
Policy Brief
metrics
Revised
Areas of research interest: joining the dots between government and research at last?
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Hannah Durrant;
Sarah Ball;
Martyn Hammersley;
Adam M Wellstead
- Funder
- Economic and Social Research Council
Research Article
metrics
Revised
It’s complicated: staff experiences of academic integrity at a Mauritian university
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Belle Louis Jinot;
Martin Oliver;
Anne Hendrik Verhoef
- Funder
- University of South Africa
Opinion Article
metrics
Knowing what you don’t know: why professional doctorate students should tread carefully with AI research assistants
[version 1; peer review: 5 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Babu George;
Angelo Leogrande;
Devilito Prasetyo Tatipang;
Pathiyil Ravi Shankar and Ms Katarzyna Paczek;
Chee Ling Thong
- Funder
- East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust
Opinion Article
metrics
Revised
High-level biocontainment laboratories: risks and necessity for society
[version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 1 not approved]
Peer Reviewers
Jean Pascal Zanders;
Javed Muhammad
Systematic Review
metrics
What goes in a funder’s Narrative CV?: A Scoping Review
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Alejandra Recio Saucedo;
Jamie Shaw;
Noemie Aubert Bonn and Karen Stroobants
Research Article
metrics
Revised
Evaluating the Types of Performance Monitoring Used in Private Chartered Universities in Uganda: A Mixed-Methods
[version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers
M Mukhibat Syaufa;
Issah Iddrisu
Research Article
metrics
Revised
Fostering open science and responsible research practices: A pre-post study
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Juan-José Boté-Vericad;
Joachim Schöpfel;
Sarahanne M Field;
Priya Silverstein
Research Article
metrics
Gender equity in scientific production in Peru and Colombia: reality or utopia in public universities?
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Miguel Angulo-Giraldo;
Luis Marcelo Olivos Jimenez
Call for Papers: AI in Academic Research open_in_new