Research on Research, Policy & Culture
Research on Research, Policy & Culture
Research Article
metrics
Revised
Bibliometric Analysis of Publications in Scopus-Indexed Public, Environmental and Occupational Health Journals Across Scimago Quartiles (2016–2024)
[version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Dwi Fitria Al Husaeni;
Steffen Lemke;
Zulfiya Kannazarova
- Funder
- the Student Research Committee, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Study Protocol
metrics
Revised
Tracking the Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Implementation Science: Protocol for a Living Scoping Review of Applications, Evaluation Approaches and Outcomes
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Julia Brasileiro;
James L David
Research Article
metrics
Revised
Can ChatGPT write better scientific titles? A comparative evaluation of human-written and AI-generated titles
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 3 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Aaron A. Funa;
Renz Alvin Gabay;
Helmi Ben Saad;
Yustinus Calvin Gai Mali;
Nurul Aini
Policy Brief
metrics
Revised
Areas of research interest: joining the dots between government and research at last?
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Hannah Durrant;
Sarah Ball;
Martyn Hammersley;
Adam M Wellstead
- Funder
- Economic and Social Research Council
Research Article
metrics
Revised
It’s complicated: staff experiences of academic integrity at a Mauritian university
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Belle Louis Jinot;
Martin Oliver;
Anne Hendrik Verhoef
- Funder
- University of South Africa
Opinion Article
metrics
Knowing what you don’t know: why professional doctorate students should tread carefully with AI research assistants
[version 1; peer review: 5 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Babu George;
Angelo Leogrande;
Devilito Prasetyo Tatipang;
Pathiyil Ravi Shankar and Ms Katarzyna Paczek;
Chee Ling Thong
- Funder
- East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust
Opinion Article
metrics
Revised
High-level biocontainment laboratories: risks and necessity for society
[version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 1 not approved]
Peer Reviewers
Jean Pascal Zanders;
Javed Muhammad
Systematic Review
metrics
What goes in a funder’s Narrative CV?: A Scoping Review
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Alejandra Recio Saucedo;
Jamie Shaw;
Noemie Aubert Bonn and Karen Stroobants
Research Article
metrics
Revised
Evaluating the Types of Performance Monitoring Used in Private Chartered Universities in Uganda: A Mixed-Methods
[version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers
M Mukhibat Syaufa;
Issah Iddrisu
Research Article
metrics
Revised
Fostering open science and responsible research practices: A pre-post study
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Juan-José Boté-Vericad;
Joachim Schöpfel;
Sarahanne M Field;
Priya Silverstein
Research Article
metrics
Gender equity in scientific production in Peru and Colombia: reality or utopia in public universities?
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Miguel Angulo-Giraldo;
Luis Marcelo Olivos Jimenez
Systematic Review
metrics
Revised
Distributing Zakatu Kasbil 'Amal as an Alternative to Student Funding, Evidence in Indonesia’s Universities
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Ade Nur Rohim;
Muhammad Irwan Ariffin;
Jonathan O'Donnell
- Funder
- Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia
Opinion Article
metrics
Revised
Foundational Competencies and Responsibilities of a Research Software Engineer: Current State and Suggestions for Future Directions
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Miranda Mundt;
Uwe Schmitt
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking
- Hessisches Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kunst
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Research Article
metrics
Revised
‘What seems to be missing is actual reality’ Why are postdocs (and closely related researchers) hesitant to engage with non-research-focused professional development opportunities?
[version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
Peer Reviewers
Santiago Schnell;
Christine Teelken;
Maresi Nerad and Cecilia Bibbo
- Funders
- Research England
- Wellcome Trust
- University of Cambridge
Research Article
metrics
Revised
The most prevalent perceived barriers to sharing research data at the point of manuscript acceptance in health and life sciences: a survey at the University of Bristol
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Juan-José Boté-Vericad;
Stefan Reichmann;
Anna Catharina Vieira Armond;
Olavo B. Amaral and Gabriel G. Costa
- Funder
- Philanthropic donation from Professor John Climax
Research Article
metrics
Revised
“It’s messy and it’s massive”: How has the open science debate developed in the post-COVID era?
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Cameron Neylon;
Diana Lucio-Arias;
Richard Holliman
- Funders
- Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC, UK)
- Social Science and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC, Canada)
- Trans-Atlantic Platform for Social Sciences and Humanities (T-AP)
Research Article
metrics
Revised
“I just very much love the journal”: Understanding the community-led publishing landscape at the University of Cambridge
[version 2; peer review: 4 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Abdelghani Maddi;
Chun-Kai Huang;
Mikael Laakso;
Leigh-Ann Butler and Madelaine Hare
Research Article
metrics
From Recruitment to Retirement: Research Infrastructure Staff Views on the Diversification of Scientific Career Paths at Universities in Sweden in 2024
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Stefano Gaburro;
Julián D. Cortés;
Emma Karoune;
Fran Bagenal
Opinion Article
metrics
Revised
Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix the peer-review process
[version 4; peer review: 5 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Balazs Aczel;
Farid Rahimi;
Vinícius Medina Kern;
Benjamin Speich;
Robert Terry;
Toivo Glatz
- Funder
- Khalifa University of Science, Technology and Research
Brief Report
metrics
Revised
Are Narrative CVs contributing towards shifting research culture? Workshop Report from the 2023 Recognition and Rewards Festival
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Maria Pietilä;
Simon Kolstoe;
Marianne Gauffriau;
Ruth Schmidt
Call for Papers: AI in Academic Research open_in_new