Research on Research, Policy & Culture
Research on Research, Policy & Culture
Systematic Review
metrics
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
Health policy at your fingertips? Mapping and evaluation of existing digital health policy repositories.
[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
Peer Reviewers
Invited
- Funder
- Global Health Policy Lab (GHPL) Initiative from the Novartis Foundation, Johnson & Johnson and Novo Nordisk
Research Article
metrics
Revised
Cross-country analysis of aggregate markups and their impact on income inequality.
[version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Anna Maria Grazia Variato;
Chrysovalantis Amountzias
Opinion Article
metrics
Revised
Addressing common inferential mistakes when failing to reject the null-hypothesis
[version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Ying Cui;
J. Alexander Heimel
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre.
- AFS was supported by BHF
- UCL BHF Research Accelerator
Research Article
metrics
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
Political bias in historiography - an experimental investigation of preferences for publication as a function of political orientation
[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
Peer Reviewers
Invited
- Funder
- Berlin University Alliance
Research Article
metrics
Fostering open science and responsible research practices: A pre-post study
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Juan-José Boté-Vericad;
Joachim Schöpfel;
Sarahanne M Field;
Priya Silverstein
Brief Report
metrics
Revised
Role, function, and expectations of research funding committees: Perspectives from committee members
[version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
Peer Reviewers
Junwen Luo;
Santiago Vasco-Morales;
Mario COCCIA;
Adrian Barnett
- Funder
- This research was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Coordinating Centre (NIHRCC), based at the University of Southampton, through its Research on Research programme of work. The views and opinions expressed in the discussion are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Health and Social Care. The NIHRCC had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Research Article
metrics
Revised
Obtaining a PhD in Portugal. Determinants of Success and Subsequent Career Paths
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Sally Hancock;
Maresi Nerad
Research Article
metrics
Open science in Spain: Influence of personal and contextual factors on deposit patterns
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Juan-José Boté-Vericad;
Blanca Rodriguez-Bravo
- Funder
- Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades. Agencia Estatal de Investigación.
Research Article
metrics
Revised
Publisher preferences for a journal transparency tool: A modified three-round Delphi study
[version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Andreas Nishikawa-Pacher;
Bahar Memarian;
Shubhada Nagarkar
- Funders
- MITACS Accelerate Industrial Postdoctoral Fellowship
- The Ottawa Hospital Academic Medical Organization (TOHAMO)
Research Article
metrics
Revised
Chinese Checkers as a Strategic Thinking Development Tool in Asia-Pacific Political Science Education
[version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Noble Po Kan Lo;
Tomislav Ivanjko
- Funder
- Education For All Online
Research Article
metrics
Revised
Strategic priorities and challenges in research software funding: Results from an international survey
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
Peer Reviewers
Adrian Barnett;
Mario COCCIA;
Claire Jean-Quartier;
Fabio Kon;
Rena Bakhshi
- Funder
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
Method Article
metrics
Revised
Expert Consensus Methods In The Humanities: An Exploration of their Potential
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Emanuela Reale;
Daniel Leising;
Stephen R Grimm
- Funder
- Templeton World Charity Foundation
Research Article
metrics
Revised
An international, cross-sectional survey of preprint attitudes among biomedical researchers
[version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 5 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Artemis Chaleplioglou;
Kimberly Powell;
Luka Ursić;
Amanda Blatch-Jones;
Shelly Melissa Pranic;
Andrew Tattersall
Study Protocol
metrics
Revised
Investigation of reporting bias in interrupted time series (ITS) studies: a study protocol
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Jos Verbeek;
Qian Yu;
Alex Dahlen
- Funders
- Monash University
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- Australian Research Council
Research Article
metrics
Revised
Does the impact of medical publications vary by disease indication and publication type? An exploration using a novel, value-based, publication metric framework: the EMPIRE Index
[version 5; peer review: 2 approved, 1 not approved]
Peer Reviewers
José Luis Ortega;
Shir Aviv-Reuven;
Arman Yurisaldi Saleh
- Funder
- Novartis Pharma
Systematic Review
metrics
Revised
A scoping review on what constitutes a good research culture
[version 3; peer review: 4 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Steven De Peuter;
Elisabeth Grey;
Elizabeth Gadd;
Stephen Curry
- Funder
- Research England
Research Article
metrics
More value and less waste in research on primary cam morphology and its natural history: a qualitative interview study of stakeholders' perspectives
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
Peer Reviewers
Samantha Bunzli;
Jinchi Tang
Research Article
metrics
Revised
Are numerical scores important for grant assessment? A cross-sectional study
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
Peer Reviewers
Mariana Pascual;
Sven E Hug;
Seba Qussini and Dr. Samer Hammoudeh;
Jan-Ole Hesselberg
- Funder
- Hrvatska Zaklada za Znanost
Research Article
metrics
Taxonomy of interventions at academic institutions to improve research quality
[version 1; peer review: 2 not approved]
Peer Reviewers
Charlotte R. Pennington;
Helen Niemeyer
Research Article
metrics
Trust in open publishing practices
[version 1; peer review: 2 not approved]
Peer Reviewers
Lex Bouter;
Amanda Eiser Hess and Bryan Cook
Call for Papers: AI in Academic Research open_in_new