Research on Research, Policy & Culture

Research on Research, Policy & Culture

Research Funding & Grant Review

track_changes Track Tracking Be alerted when new articles are added in this gateway (manage your tracking alerts via your account) Stop tracking this gateway
Home Gateways Research on Research, Policy & Culture
1-20 of 31 ARTICLES
Previous Next
 in 
Featured Article
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73893.2
Opinion Article metrics
Revised
Grant writing and grant peer review as questionable research practices
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Stijn Conix, Andreas De Block, Krist Vaesen
Peer Reviewers Lambros Roumbanis; Tamarinde Haven
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 24 Dec 2021
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.154665.3
Brief Report metrics
Revised
Role, function, and expectations of research funding committees: Perspectives from committee members
[version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
Amanda Blatch-Jones, Cherish Boxall, Katie Meadmore
Peer Reviewers Junwen Luo; Santiago Vasco-Morales; Mario Coccia; Adrian Barnett
  • Funder
  • This research was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Coordinating Centre (NIHRCC), based at the University of Southampton, through its Research on Research programme of work. The views and opinions expressed in the discussion are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Health and Social Care. The NIHRCC had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 06 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.155879.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
Strategic priorities and challenges in research software funding: Results from an international survey
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
Eric A. Jensen, Daniel S. Katz
Peer Reviewers Adrian Barnett; Mario Coccia; Claire Jean-Quartier; Fabio Kon; Rena Bakhshi
  • Funder
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 06 Jan 2025
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.139743.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
Are numerical scores important for grant assessment? A cross-sectional study
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
Ivan Buljan, David G. Pina, Antonija Mijatović, Ana Marušić
Peer Reviewers Mariana Pascual; Sven E Hug; Seba Qussini and Dr. Samer Hammoudeh; Jan-Ole Hesselberg
  • Funder
  • Hrvatska Zaklada za Znanost
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 05 Sep 2024
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.142942.1
Research Article metrics
An exploratory study of critical incidents within public organizations during leadership change
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]
Rian Pramana Suwanda, Fendy Suhariadi, Bagong Suyanto, Suparto Wijoyo
Peer Reviewers Siti Kholifah
PUBLISHED 23 Apr 2024
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.124082.3
Opinion Article metrics
Revised
‘Science by consensus’ impedes scientific creativity and progress: A simple alternative to funding biomedical research
[version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
Nejat Düzgüneş
Peer Reviewers Ferric Fang; Alejandra Recio-Saucedo; Stijn Conix; Gerald Schweiger; Jamie Shaw
  • Funder
  • N/A
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 21 Feb 2024
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.144590.1
Research Article metrics
Building a fatigue research collaborative: A scientometrics, topic and gap analysis
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Ghazaleh Aali, Rachel Ainley, Julia Ambler, Tina Peckmezian, Farhad Shokraneh
Peer Reviewers Jafar Kolahi; Luis Manuel Mota de Sousa
  • Funder
  • Crohn's and Colitis UK
PUBLISHED 29 Nov 2023
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.138482.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
The innovative dimension of the research training programmes under H2020-MSCA-ITN: a methodological approach to track, measure and analyse innovative aspects and provide policy-feedback conclusions.
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
Ioannis Bitsios, Fabrizio Martone, Riccardo Ricci, Audrey Arfi
Peer Reviewers Costis Kompis; Nikolaos D. Alexopoulos; Alessandro Marino
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 26 Oct 2023
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.130188.2
Method Article metrics
Revised
Autonomous, bidding, credible, decentralized, ethical, and funded (ABCDEF) publishing
[version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Taiki Oka, Kaito Takashima, Kohei Ueda, Yuki Mori, Kyoshiro Sasaki, Hiro Taiyo Hamada, Masahito Yamagata, Yuki Yamada
Peer Reviewers Timothy M. Errington; David Mellor; Tae-Sul Seo
  • Funders
  • JSPS KAKENHI
  • JST SPRING
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 05 Oct 2023
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.125886.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
Community review: a robust and scalable selection system for resource allocation within open science and innovation communities
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Chris L.B. Graham, Thomas E. Landrain, Amber Vjestica, Camille Masselot, Elliot Lawton, Leo Blondel, Luca Haenal, Bastian Greshake Tzovaras, Marc Santolini
Peer Reviewers Ferdinando Patat; Dimitrios Kouis
  • Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche
  • AXA Research Fund
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 18 Apr 2023
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.74211.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
How academic sabbaticals are used and how they contribute to research – a small-scale study of the University of Cambridge using interviews and analysis of administrative data
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Becky Ioppolo, Steven Wooding
Peer Reviewers Kathryn Oliver; Katherine Christian
  • Funders
  • Research England
  • University of Cambridge
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 14 Mar 2023
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.125400.2
Method Article metrics
Revised
The effect of the scale of grant scoring on ranking accuracy
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Peter M. Visscher, Loic Yengo
Peer Reviewers Rachel Heyard; Alejandra Recio-Saucedo
  • Funder
  • The Australian Research Council
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 06 Feb 2023
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.74374.3
Method Article metrics
Revised
Understanding the funding characteristics of research impact: A proof-of-concept study linking REF 2014 impact case studies with Researchfish grant agreements
[version 3; peer review: 3 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Gavin Reddick, Dmitry Malkov, Beverley Sherbon, Jonathan Grant
Peer Reviewers Adam Kamenetzky; Daniele Rotolo; Mark Reed; Mike Thelwall; Maria Theresa Norn
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 20 Sep 2022
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.123367.1
Research Article metrics
How mission-driven policies challenge traditional research funding systems
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
Kaare Aagaard, Maria Theresa Norn, Andreas Kjær Stage
Peer Reviewers Elvira Uyarra; Steven Wooding; Alessandro Muscio
  • Funder
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden
PUBLISHED 18 Aug 2022
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.75098.1
Opinion Article metrics
The jury is out: a new approach to awarding science prizes
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Michael Hill
Peer Reviewers David Moher; Virginia Barbour
  • Funder
  • Swiss National Science Foundation
PUBLISHED 03 Dec 2021
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.51400.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
Scientific research and innovation response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Peru
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Jeel Moya-Salazar, Lucia Gomez-Saenz, Betsy Cañari, Hans Contreras-Pulache
Peer Reviewers Rodrigo Ernesto Salazar Gamarra; Mario Coccia
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 12 Nov 2021
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.52965.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
Ethics issues identified by applicants and ethics experts in Horizon 2020 grant proposals
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Ivan Buljan, David G Pina, Ana Marušić
Peer Reviewers Vasiliki Mollaki; Juraj Koppel
  • Funder
  • Croatian Science Foundation
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 06 Sep 2021
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.26092.2
Brief Report metrics
Revised
Interprofessional grant writing seminar for early career faculty in a small, isolated teaching center
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
India King, Andrea Christopher, Ann Hansen, Ami Student, Jeff Sordahl, Sarah Naidoo, Elaine Nguyen, Sarai Ambert-Pompey, Amber Fisher, Rick Tivis, C. Scott Smith
Peer Reviewers Mamta Singh; Dawn DeWitt
  • Funder
  • Office of Academic Affiliations, Department of Veterans Affairs
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 30 Jul 2021
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.53654.1
Opinion Article metrics
The imperative to find the courage to redesign the biomedical research enterprise
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
Bibiana Bielekova, Shannon Brownlee
Peer Reviewers Paul Glasziou; Andrew Lee Hufton
  • Funder
  • National Institute Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Lown Institute
PUBLISHED 23 Jul 2021
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.26615.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
The varying openness of digital open science tools
[version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Louise Bezuidenhout, Johanna Havemann
Peer Reviewers Björn Brembs; Chris H. J. Hartgerink
  • Funder
  • Economic and Social Research Council
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 17 May 2021
1-20 of 31 ARTICLES
Previous Next
Gateway Areas
Call for Papers: AI in Academic Research open_in_new
Our Links
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.