Research on Research, Policy & Culture

Research on Research, Policy & Culture

track_changes Track Tracking Be alerted when new articles are added in this gateway (manage your tracking alerts via your account) Stop tracking this gateway
Home Gateways Research on Research, Policy & Culture
181-200 of 265 ARTICLES
Previous Next
 in 
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17359.2
Opinion Article metrics
Revised
NGOs’ experiences of navigating the open access landscape
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Nilam McGrath
Peer Reviewers Ross Mounce; Samir Hachani
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 18 Oct 2019
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.18453.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
Turning the tables: A university league-table based on quality not quantity
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Adrian G. Barnett, David Moher
Peer Reviewers Ellen Hazelkorn; David M. Nichols
  • Funder
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 29 Jul 2019
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.18310.2
Research Note metrics
Revised
Causes of reporting bias: a theoretical framework
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Jenny T van der Steen, Gerben ter Riet, Cornelis A van den Bogert, Lex M Bouter
Peer Reviewers Ksenija Bazdaric; Arnaud Vaganay
  • Funders
  • Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO)
  • H2020 European Research Council
  • Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 17 Jul 2019
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.18757.1
Research Article metrics
Understanding the contribution of UK public health research to clinical guidelines: a bibliometric analysis
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Susan Guthrie, Gavin Cochrane, Advait Deshpande, Benoit Macaluso, Vincent Larivière
Peer Reviewers Mike Thelwall; Claudio Tresoldi and Andrea Tittarelli
  • Funder
  • Department of Health & Social Care
PUBLISHED 15 Jul 2019
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.19156.1
Research Article metrics
Measuring bias, burden and conservatism in research funding processes
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Susan Guthrie, Daniela Rodriguez Rincon, Gordon McInroy, Becky Ioppolo, Salil Gunashekar
Peer Reviewers Adrian Barnett; Robyn Tamblyn
  • Funder
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
PUBLISHED 12 Jun 2019
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.18471.2
Research Note metrics
Revised
Examining the role of funders in ensuring value and reducing waste in research: An organizational case-study of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Evelyn P. Whitlock, Joe V. Selby, Kelly M. Dunham, Alicia Fernandez, Laura P. Forsythe, Grayson Norquist
Peer Reviewers Hans Lund; Mona Nasser
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 11 Jun 2019
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17710.2
Opinion Article metrics
Revised
Open laboratory notebooks: good for science, good for society, good for scientists
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Matthieu Schapira, The Open Lab Notebook Consortium, Rachel J. Harding
Peer Reviewers Matthew H. Todd, Edwin Tse, Marat Korsik and Mathamsanqa Bhebhe; Lara M. Mangravite; Jean-Baptiste Poline
  • Funders
  • Eshelman Institute for Innovation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Innovative Medicines Initiative
  • Leicester Institute of Chemical and Structural Biology
  • Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science
  • Canada Foundation for Innovation
  • Genome Canada
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Huntington's Disease Society of America
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 02 Apr 2019
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17979.1
Research Article metrics
The impact of the open-access status on journal indices: a review of medical journals
[version 1; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Saif Aldeen AlRyalat, Mohammad Saleh, Mohammad Alaqraa, Alaa Alfukaha, Yara Alkayed, Maryann Abaza, Hadeel Abu Saa, Mohamed Alshamiry
Peer Reviewers Ernesto Roldan-Valadez; Suneet Sood; Deeb N. Salem; Sung-Tae Hong
PUBLISHED 07 Mar 2019
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16771.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
Key Concepts for assessing claims about treatment effects and making well-informed treatment choices
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
Andrew D. Oxman, Iain Chalmers, Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren, Informed Health Choices group
Peer Reviewers Catherine Mathews; Richard Lehman; David Henry and Paulina Stehlik
  • Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • Research Council of Norway
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 23 Jan 2019
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17615.1
Opinion Article metrics
What is reproducibility?
[version 1; peer review: 3 approved with reservations]
Gerben ter Riet, Bram W.C. Storosum, Aeilko H. Zwinderman
Peer Reviewers Steven N. Goodman; C. Glenn Begley; Ksenija Bazdaric
PUBLISHED 09 Jan 2019
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16523.2
Opinion Article metrics
Revised
Sharing health research data – the role of funders in improving the impact
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
Robert F. Terry, Katherine Littler, Piero L. Olliaro
Peer Reviewers Phaik-Yeong Cheah; Amanda Blatch-Jones; Keith C. Norris
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 24 Dec 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17425.1
Opinion Article metrics
The principles of tomorrow's university
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Daniel S. Katz, Gabrielle Allen, Lorena A. Barba, Devin R. Berg, Holly Bik, Carl Boettiger, Christine L. Borgman, C. Titus Brown, Stuart Buck, Randy Burd, Anita de Waard, Martin Paul Eve, Brian E. Granger, Josh Greenberg, Adina Howe, Bill Howe, May Khanna, Timothy L. Killeen, Matthew Mayernik, Erin McKiernan, Chris Mentzel, Nirav Merchant, Kyle E. Niemeyer, Laura Noren, Sarah M. Nusser, Daniel A. Reed, Edward Seidel, MacKenzie Smith, Jeffrey R. Spies, Matt Turk, John D. Van Horn, Jay Walsh
Peer Reviewers Lucy Montgomery; Olivia Guest
  • Funders
  • Elsevier Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Science Foundation
PUBLISHED 11 Dec 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15610.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
Use and effectiveness of the Individual Development Plan among postdoctoral researchers: findings from a cross-sectional study
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Nathan L. Vanderford, Teresa M. Evans, L. Todd Weiss, Lindsay Bira, Jazmin Beltran-Gastelum
Peer Reviewers Jonathan S. Wiest and Chanelle Case Borden; Tammy R. L. Collins; Adriana Bankston; Kristen L. W. Walton; Richard McGee
  • Funders
  • University of Texas
  • University of Kentucky
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 25 Oct 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16460.1
Opinion Article metrics
Publishing peer review materials
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Jeffrey Beck, Kathryn Funk, Melissa Harrison, Jo McEntyre, Josie Breen, Andy Collings, Paul Donohoe, Michael Evans, Louisa Flintoft, Audrey Hamelers, Phil Hurst, Thomas Lemberger, Jennifer Lin, Niamh O'Connor, Michael Parkin, Sam Parker, Peter Rodgers, Magdalena Skipper, Michael Stoner
Peer Reviewers Jessica K Polka; Tony Ross-Hellauer
  • Funders
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine
  • Wellcome Trust
PUBLISHED 17 Oct 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15429.2
Opinion Article metrics
Revised
The Congress Impact Factor: A proposal from board members of the World Society of Emergency Surgeons.it (WSES) and Academy of Emergency Medicine and Care (AcEMC)
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Belinda De Simone, Luca Ansaloni, Micheal Denis Kelly, Federico Coccolini, Massimo Sartelli, Salomone Di Saverio, Michele Pisano, Gianfranco Cervellin, Gianluca Baiocchi, Fausto Catena
Peer Reviewers Francesco Azzaroli; Luca Luzzi
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 15 Oct 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15479.2
Research Article metrics
Negative/null result
Revised
Do funding applications where peer reviewers disagree have higher citations? A cross-sectional study.
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Adrian G Barnett, Scott R. Glisson, Stephen Gallo
Peer Reviewers Jonathan Shepherd and Jeremy C. Wyatt; Shahar Avin and Steven Wooding
  • Funder
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 15 Oct 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16493.1
Review metrics
The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Lesley A. Schimanski, Juan Pablo Alperin
Peer Reviewers Jonathan P. Tennant; Aaron Barlow
  • Funder
  • Open Society Foundations
PUBLISHED 05 Oct 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16231.1
Research Article metrics
Raising the status of software in research: A survey-based evaluation of the Software Sustainability Institute Fellowship Programme
[version 1; peer review: 3 approved with reservations]
Shoaib Sufi, Caroline Jay
Peer Reviewers Colin C. Venters; Dan Sholler; Lois Curfman McInnes
  • Funders
  • Economic and Social Research Council
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
PUBLISHED 03 Oct 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15256.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
What is a predatory journal? A scoping review
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
Kelly D. Cobey, Manoj M Lalu, Becky Skidmore, Nadera Ahmadzai, Agnes Grudniewicz, David Moher
Peer Reviewers Monica Berger; Johann Mouton; Joanna Chataway
  • Funder
  • University of Ottawa, Research Chair
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 23 Aug 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13030.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
Positive bias for European men in peer reviewed applications for faculty position at Karolinska Institutet
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Sarah Holst, Sara Hägg
Peer Reviewers Inés Sánchez de Madariaga; Stephen A Gallo
  • Funder
  • Karolinska Institutet
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 14 Aug 2018
181-200 of 265 ARTICLES
Previous Next
Gateway Areas
Call for Papers: AI in Academic Research open_in_new
Our Links
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.