Studies Within A Trial (SWAT)

Studies Within A Trial (SWAT)

track_changes Track Tracking Be alerted when new articles are added in this collection (manage your tracking alerts via your account) Stop tracking this collection
Home Collections Studies Within A Trial (SWAT)
1-18 of 18 ARTICLES
 in 
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.145823.1
Research Article metrics
Using X, Facebook QR codes to optimise recruitment to a feasibility trial Enhancing Men’s Awareness of Testicular Diseases (E-MAT) in a cluster randomised Study Within A Trial (SWAT): Lessons learned.
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]
Frances Shiely, Eoghan Cooke, Megan McCarthy, Darren Dahly, Janas Harrington, Gillian W. Shorter, Martin P. Davoren, Josephine Hegarty, Aileen Murphy, Ann Kirby, David Murphy, Steve Robertson, Michael J. Rovito, Serena Fitzgerald, Alan O'Connor, Mícheál O'Riordan, Mohamad M Saab
Peer Reviewers Nikolaos Boumparis
  • Funder
  • Health Research Board
PUBLISHED 28 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.130154.1
Research Article metrics
SWAT 137: A 2x2 randomised factorial SWAT of the use of a pen and brief information leaflet to improve recruitment in a randomised controlled trial of a community-based clinic for patients with persistent physical symptoms
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]
David White, Laura Sutton, Cara Mooney, Jeremy Dawson, Chris Burton, PROMETHEUS Group
Peer Reviewers Peter Knapp; Michelle E Kho
  • Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
PUBLISHED 11 Sep 2023
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.52164.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
A 2x2 randomised factorial SWAT of the use of a pen and small, financial incentive to improve recruitment in a randomised controlled trial of yoga for older adults with multimorbidity
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Caroline Fairhurst, Jenny Roche, Laura Bissell, Catherine Hewitt, Jess Hugill-Jones, Jenny Howsam, Camila S Maturana, Belen Corbacho Martin, Shirley-Anne S Paul, Fi Rose, David J Torgerson, Lesley Ward, Laura Wiley, Garry A Tew
Peer Reviewers Stephan Dombrowski; Frances Shiely
  • Funder
  • National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 04 Mar 2022
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.75339.1
Research Article metrics
A randomised trial of the effects on recruitment and retention of including a wet-ink signature and photograph in the patient invitation letter for a clinical trial: results from a Study Within a Trial (SWAT 3 and SWAT 53)
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Rohan Anand, Judy Bradley, Brenda O'Neill, Danny F. McAuley, Mike Clarke
Peer Reviewers Rustam Al Shahi Salman; Lydia O’Sullivan
  • Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • Medical Research Council
PUBLISHED 11 Feb 2022
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23767.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
Including a pen and/or cover letter, containing social incentive text, had no effect on questionnaire response rate: a factorial randomised controlled Study within a Trial
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Sophie James, Adwoa Parker, Sarah Cockayne, Sara Rodgers, Caroline Fairhurst, David J. Torgerson, Sarah Rhodes, Sarah Cotterill
Peer Reviewers Taylor Coffey and Eilidh Duncan; Susanne Grylka-Baeschlin
  • Funder
  • National Institute for Health Research
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 08 Nov 2021
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.24244.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
An embedded randomised controlled retention trial of personalised text messages compared to non-personalised text messages in an orthopaedic setting
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Alex S. Mitchell, Liz Cook, Alexandra Dean, Caroline Fairhurst, Matthew Northgraves, David J. Torgerson, Mike Reed
Peer Reviewers Michelle E Kho; David J Keene
  • Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • 3M
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 15 Sep 2021
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23018.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
Using pens as an incentive for questionnaire return in an orthopaedic trial: an embedded randomised controlled retention trial
[version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Alex S. Mitchell, Liz Cook, Alexandra Dean, Caroline Fairhurst, Matthew Northgraves, David J. Torgerson, Mike Reed
Peer Reviewers Frances Shiely; Matthias Briel
  • Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • 3M
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 07 Sep 2021
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.50890.2
Brief Report metrics
Revised
SWAT 76 evaluation: randomised evaluation of sending pre-notification cards to trial participants before a face-to-face primary outcome measurement to increase attendance
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Shaun Treweek, Stephanie Gallant, Annie S. Anderson
Peer Reviewers Christopher Sutton; Michelle E Kho
  • Funder
  • Scottish Government
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 15 Jul 2021
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.24938.1
Research Article metrics
Patient recruitment to a diabetic retinopathy screening trial through optimised patient information materials: an embedded study within a trial (SWAT)
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Rebecca Sheridan, Peter Knapp, Peter Bower, Vichithranie Madurasinghe, Deborah M Broadbent, Lola Awoyale, Amu Wang, Tracy Moitt, on behalf of the ISDR Trial Group
Peer Reviewers Winfried M Amoaku; Manavi D Sindal
  • Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • Programme Grants for Applied Research
PUBLISHED 28 Jul 2020
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.21059.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
The effectiveness of a contingent financial incentive to improve trial follow up; a randomised study within a trial (SWAT)
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Catherine Arundel, Elizabeth Coleman, Caroline Fairhurst, Emily Peckham, Della Bailey, Simon Gilbody
Peer Reviewers Frances Shiely; Sarah Rhodes
  • Funder
  • Health Technology Assessment Programme
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 17 Jul 2020
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23651.1
Research Article metrics
Enclosing a pen to improve response rate to postal questionnaire: an embedded randomised controlled trial
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Rachel Cunningham-Burley, Jenny Roche, Caroline Fairhurst, Sarah Cockayne, Catherine Hewitt, Heather Iles-Smith, David J. Torgerson, SSHeW Study Team
Peer Reviewers Anna Duncan, Magaly Aceves Martins and Hanne Bruhn; Karen Bracken
  • Funders
  • MRC Prometheus
  • University of York
  • NIHR Public Health Research Programme
PUBLISHED 09 Jun 2020
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.24051.1
Research Article metrics
Optimised patient information materials and recruitment to a study of behavioural activation in older adults: an embedded study within a trial
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Peter Knapp, Simon Gilbody, Janet Holt, Ada Keding, Natasha Mitchell, David K. Raynor, Jonathan Silcock, David J. Torgerson
Peer Reviewers Mike Clarke; Shaun P. Treweek
  • Funder
  • National Institute for Health Research
PUBLISHED 21 May 2020
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.22361.1
Research Article metrics
Clinical trial
An evaluation of a personalised text message reminder compared to a standard text message on postal questionnaire response rates: an embedded randomised controlled trial
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Ann Cochrane, Charlie Welch, Caroline Fairhurst, Sarah Cockayne, David J. Torgerson, OTIS Study Group
Peer Reviewers Frances Shiely; Phil J. Edwards
  • Funder
  • National Institute for Health Research
PUBLISHED 26 Feb 2020
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.21750.1
Research Article metrics
Video-augmented vs standard consent in an early ICU cycling feasibility trial: a randomized embedded recruitment trial
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Michelle E. Kho, Mark Duffett, France J. Clarke, Melissa Shears, Alexander J. Molloy, Deborah J. Cook
Peer Reviewers David J. Torgerson; Thierry Boulain
  • Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Canada Research Chairs
PUBLISHED 24 Jan 2020
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.19743.1
Study Protocol metrics
Protocol for a factorial randomised controlled trial, embedded within WHiTE 8 COPAL, of an Enhanced Trainee Principal Investigator Package and Additional Digital Nudge to increase recruitment rates
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Nickil Agni, Caroline Fairhurst, Catriona McDaid, Mike Reed, David J. Torgerson
Peer Reviewers Mike Clarke; Kath Star and Victoria Bell
PUBLISHED 22 Jul 2019
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.18939.1
Research Article metrics
Clinical trial
Does handwriting the name of a potential trial participant on an invitation letter improve recruitment rates? A randomised controlled study within a trial
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Jennifer McCaffery, Alex S. Mitchell, Caroline Fairhurst, Sarah Cockayne, Sara Rodgers, Clare Relton, David J. Torgerson, OTIS Study Team
Peer Reviewers Martin C. Gulliford; Miles D. Witham
  • Funders
  • Health Technology Assessment Programme
  • York University
PUBLISHED 14 May 2019
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.18300.1
Research Article metrics
Clinical trial
Using pens as an incentive for trial recruitment of older adults: An embedded randomised controlled trial
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Katie Whiteside, Lydia Flett, Alex S. Mitchell, Caroline Fairhurst, Sarah Cockayne, Sara Rodgers, David J. Torgerson, OTIS Study Group
Peer Reviewers Daniel Hind; Nicola Mills
  • Funder
  • National Institute for Health Research
PUBLISHED 21 Mar 2019
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.14591.2
Research Article metrics
Clinical trial
Revised
A study update newsletter or Post-it® note did not increase postal questionnaire response rates in a falls prevention trial: an embedded randomised factorial trial
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Sara Rodgers, Illary Sbizzera, Sarah Cockayne, Caroline Fairhurst, Sarah E. Lamb, Wesley Vernon, Judith Watson, Catherine Hewitt, David J. Torgerson
Peer Reviewers Shaun P. Treweek; Phil J. Edwards and Benjamin Woolf
  • Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • York Trials Unit
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 19 Feb 2019
1-18 of 18 ARTICLES
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.